The known universe seems, in a nutshell, muonstruck. But it only took 12 days for another Italian physicist to throw in the cold water of pleasure. Carlo Rovelli, a founder of loop quantum gravity theory, who sought to combine quantum mechanics and general closeness, and the author of Helgoland: Understanding the Quantum Revolution, published in English in May, writes in The Keeper, “Physicists like to think of themselves as radical.”
This self-pretense, which Rovelli continues, is understandable, especially by physicists, who make their names out of human understanding. But it also takes labs to figure out what they know. He cites examples of potential “discoveries” in supersymmetry that initially seemed like a terrible ground but didn’t live up to the hype. Rovelli especially zeroed in on the word “hint,” which appeared in Fermilab’s press release. “I don’t remember a time when no one was talking about‘ signs ’that new supersymmetric particles were‘ about to be discovered. tight-fitting and signsPerhaps, there will always be a value, unlike the 0.0000002 percent of Fermilab, that would be statistically insignificant.
In 1807, William Wordsworth published an ode to Romantic poetry while the discovery of the quark was the fragment of physics in 1964: a success. “Quest for Immortality from the Recollections of Early Childhood” recounts the poet’s emotional separation from nature; his happy discovery of it in childhood memories; and his bitter resolution that, even if the Earth were to die, the propositions of immortality at the present time would keep him in his sorrow.
Although no one can go back in time
In the glory of the grass, in the glory of the flower;
Let’s not be sad, let’s find out
Strength of the rest;
In introductory sympathy
Who has done it before;
In soothing spring thoughts
From human suffering; To believe seen through death…
An interesting method of literature called ecocriticism, started in the 1990s by the English philosopher Jonathan Bate, argues that Romantic poetry like this ode may suggest ways to think of our mortal planet as a that we must be saved – or perhaps, in sorrow, and perhaps love, let it die. But Wordsworth’s poetry isn’t just about the fate of humans and the blue planet. The subject is also fears — what the physicists of the Muon g-2 project call “clues.”
As it happens, these are hints of the same thing: immortality.
The central controversy in physics is that the building blocks of the universe will survive even if, or even when, the people who count them, and the planet on which we live, all die. To see the immortal universe is to try to see nothing more beautiful like the preferred daffodil and walnut trees of Wordsworth, but to look into the coldest space, the black holes. and the small electrical component of theoretical subatomic particles. These entities do not have blood flow, of course, but neither do DNA; they are not vulnerable to pandemics, however violent, or the dividends and carbon damage. They don’t live, so they don’t die. Modeling the universe as accurately as possible is to try to find something that even the strictest atheist agrees on is endless-to try to achieve, in a lab, fear. of immortality